Organizational Behavior Case Study Using

Abstract We chose to look at a military case that was exposed by the media last year in which brigadier general superior general (BG) crowd BG Botchie of the United States cable Force was impeach of fetch that was unbecoming of an incumbent. By examining the roots of guiltless government activityal hypothesis as well as the systems theory prelude to management, we will be able to see what aspects and principles should be part utilized and enforced in enunciate to prevent such incidences from reoccurring. ? organizational Behavior Case guinea pig UsingClassical Organization Theory and Systems Theory In order to see where Brigadier public James Botchies management went wrong, we will use the guileless organization theory and systems theory to evaluate his action and decisions. To provide halt to our conclusion, Tommy will shargon a in-person encounter he had with BG Botchie. Quotes from several(a) texts will also offer expect to our position that BG Botchies appro ach to management was not unaccompanied ineffective, but also inappropriate for an police officer in the United States air out Force.Classical Organization Theory While whatsoever aspects of classical organizational theory can be considered out of date, it has been incessantly progressing over the past century to better suit current study milieus. From Taylors scientific management theory to Webers bureaucratic theory all the way to Mo hotshoty and Reileys administrative theory, classical organizational theory has developed some of the some fundamental principles to help better manage muckle in the giveplace.In order to effectively understand how classical organization theory could help a situation, such as the mavin regarding Brigadier General James Botchie as reported by the Air Force Times, one must first look at the raw material principles behind the theory. One of the four central points in Frederick Taylors scientific management theory is to, closely supervise wor kers, and use reward and penalty as motivators (Kinicki & Kreitner, 2009). In BG Botchies situation, he provided little to no inspection to his subordinates and was described as hands-off, uninformed and at times uncaring (Fontaine 2). This inadequacy of upervision caused the military equal opportunity office (MEO) to be an unorganized and unproductive environment that allowed discrimination and intimidation to go undisciplined and undocumented in m any cases. An other(a) Taylorism stated that the task of management is planning and watch (Walonick, 1993). From what the Air Force Times showed, BG Botchie did not attend either of these guidelines. armed services organizations require all parties to abide by strict codes of conduct in order to function as a well-oiled machine. BG Botchies actions not besides reflect poorly on his work ethics, but also his lesson ethics.He did not act as is expected of a United States valet Personnel atomic number 18 expected to conduct themse lves in accordance with the highest standards of personal and professional integrity and ethics. At a minimum, all personnel shall obey with directives issued by the Secretary of Defense regarding the Standards of Conduct and Government Ethics. (Dalton, 1997). Much standardized the rank levels involved in military organizations, Max Webers bureaucratic theory emphasized the need for a hierarchical social organization of power (Walonick, 1993).In order to continue maintaining get the hang among soldiers or workers alike, there is a need for definite rules and a slang line of authority and have (Kinicki & Kreitner, 2009). BG Botchie allowed this line to become blurred when he developed friendships with his subordinates. Not lonesome(prenominal) did this lead to unprofessional conduct in the form of creating an inner boys only clique that harassed female coworkers, it also raised an ethical plight in that BG Botchie engaged in business deals with subordinates and possibly used authorities resources to further his profits (Fontaine 4).There is a reason for positions of authority and that is to maintain control and productivity in the office. BG Botchie instead used his authority to foster versed harassment and gender discrimination, build unprofessional relationships and misappropriate government resources for his testify benefit (Fontaine 1). Mooney and Reillys administrative theory proved to be the most rigid out of the classical organization theories. This theory put the stress on establishing a universal set of management principles that could be use to all organizations (Walonick, 1993).It is now realized that this is not possible with the fast paced changing of times however, this method could be used to help remedy the inconsistencies that occurred in BG Botchies wing. For example, if there was a uniform set of rules and procedures set in place and enforced regularly, flock like BG Botchie would not have a chance to abuse their power. Throug hout examining the classical organizational approach to declaration Brigadier General James Botchies erroneous behaviors, the key solution is enforcement of hierarchy.None of this would have occurred if BG Botchies superiors had paid closer attention to his actions. While people in positions of authority should not have to instill devotion in order to get results, they should be treated with the wish they deserve. That respect facilitates force and respect for fellow coworkers as well. By maintaining the proper order of ranks, work is effectuate as a result of a sense of soak in work and duty to ones job. In sum total to an increase in productivity, the level of discrimination and harassment would decline for fear of punishment.When the rules ar enforced and there are positive and negative repercussions for behaviors, people are more inclined to follow the regulations set forth. Simply put, to annul negative situations, such as BG Botchies, enforce the rules and regulation s that are set forth. Systems tone-beginning This situation could have also benefited from the systems approach to the Ohio Air National apply Organization. The United States Air Force maintains a strict code of conduct as an entire organization and also employs separate, more detailed rules and regulations for those enlisted and those who are officers.The enlisted ranks are seen as the workers or followers to the officer ranks. The officer ranks are seen as the leaders of the organization and they are expected to set the tones for how those that follow them are to conduct themselves. Rules are established to help keep the feature between the appointed leaders and those who are the followers and to prevent any bias from effecting promotions or allowing preferential treatment from the leaders of the organization. Brigadier General James Botchie was fortunate to experience both the leader and follower sides of the Air Force.BG Botchie started out in the enlisted ranks before he was commissioned to the officer ranks. I had the opportunity to work for BG Botchie after the September 11th attacks on the ground Trade Centers in 2001. He was the flight commander and highest ranking officer for the mission. As a unit, the 121st Air Refueling Wing (ARW) was assigned to support Operation Enduring Freedom at the Incirlik Air Base in Turkey. My job as an enlisted worker was for various electronic functions of our airplane.My ultimate design was to make sure that the pilots could complete their mission, which required all of the aircraft to be operational. We accomplished this mission and pleased BG Botchie. He attempted to reward us (the enlisted workers) with sousing beverages in an enlisted only establishment. I tell you this story to give to that degree another example of the rules being established and BG Botchie acting as though he was above them and as if there would be no ramifications for prisonbreak them. Systems theory can be described as having all compo nents of an organization inter related to.By changing one variable, many others whitethorn also be naturalized (Kinicki & Kreitner, 2009). Modern day management has to understand that the decisions imposed on one part of an organization can have a great restore on other members of the organization, even if they are not directly related to the initial decision. BG Botchies decisions were not thoroughly thought out and he did not consider the impact that they would have across the organization. The decisions he do for his immediate group not only affected the morale, behavior, and work ethics, but it also reached throughout the entire Air National Guard.The 121st ARW is always partnered with other units from all across the United States. This behavior is observed by others who may have had a different managerial style and expectation. This is also unequivocal in the following quotes The organizational systems theory also infuses a nicety that is transformed to a learning environm ent. A creative learning environment will also help the organization and its members realize that the small decisions do today may affect a global impact tomorrow (Smith & Taylor, 2000). The Central premise behind holding a vision is that somehow I can shape my future(a), systems thinking helps us see how our own actions have shaped our current reality, thereby giving us bureau that we can create a different reality in the future (Smith & Taylor, 2000). BG Botchie did not infuse the culture with the set of values and morals that the air force instilled in his appointment as commanding general. If Brigadier General James Botchie analyzed his decisions using the systems approach for his managerial and decision based processes, his rush may have had a different outcome.Conclusion In conclusion, it is generally in everyones best interest to abide by the rules and regulations of an organization since they are set forth as a way to maintain order and protection for the employees. The classical organization theory and systems theory have clear cut principles that help to build a strong organization, when the policies are followed correctly. Having employees that respect the hierarchy of the organization is also essential to a successful workplace.Brigadier General James Botchie did not follow these guidelines and it speak to him the respect of his peers and nearly cost him his job.? Bibliography Dalton, J. H. (1997). General Regulations Administration of Discipline. U. S. Navy Regulations, 1990 Interim Change, 101-102. Fontaine, S. (2012, May 23). Report inside information 1-stars Inappropriate Conduct. Retrieved from Air Force Time Mobile http//www. airforcetimes. com/mobile/index. php? storyUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww. airforcetimes. com%2Fnews%2F2011%2F04%2Fair-force-ig-details-conduct-BG Botchie-041811w%2F Kinicki, A. & Kreitner, R. (2009). Organizational Dynamics and Human Behavior. The McGraw- mound Companies Inc. Smith, K. D. , & Taylor, W. G. (2000). The learn ing organisation ideal in civilian Service organisations deriving a measure. The Learning Organization, 194-205. University, C. M. (2008). In Administration, Globalization and Multiculturalism (pp. 25, 30, 79, 360). McGraw Hill Companies, Inc. Walonick, D. S. (1993). Organizational Theory and Behavior. Retrieved from http//statpac. org/walonick/organizational-theory. htm