Terrorism Act in Canada Essay Example for Free

Terrorism stand for in Canada EssayThe imp correspond of the Anti-Terrorism fiddle on the Islamics and Arabs in Canada The Anti-terrorism Act in Canada and its effects on the Muslim and Arabic communities folk 11, 2001 marked a catastrophic flip-flop non only in American society nevertheless in both western verbalise including Canada. The terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon have had a ripple effect, bedcover to the entire world and terrifying thousands of people. Following these attacks, world populations were devastated and regimens faced a never-before seen need to make jurisprudences regime this red-hot form of terror. Countries like the United States of America, United Kingdom, and Canada have passed anti-terrorism legislations that define terrorism and how to respond and foresee much(prenominal) attacks. Gener tout ensembley speaking, some scholars and ordinary individuals argue that the in the buff anti-terrorism Act in Canada may sharpen to combat terrorism but it also violates the rights of certain individuals. The new Act gave the authorities especi eachy the guard task forces the power to investigate suspect terrorist cases without worrying or so the take aim of rights and freedoms. This ends with the question of pledge of state versus the rights of individuals.They argue that the shock and the disbelief that infected the Canadian Government after the September attacks to take a fast and effective legislation to protect the country from a prospective threat, pushed the presidential term to implement the post-horse C-36 that was turned to be the Anti-terrorism Act in four months only after the September Attacks without thinking about the consequences of this new law. (Andreychuk) Firstly we should know what is the Bill C-36 or the Anti-Terrorism Act to examine whether or not it abnormal some minorities in Canada.As stated above, the Bill C-36 was a quick response to the September Attacks in the th e States. Bill C-36 was first introduced in the House of Commons by Justice Minister Anne McLellan on 15 October 2001. The Bill defines terrorist operation as an act that is committed in whole or in piece of music for a political, religious, or ideological purpose, objective, or cause. (Mazer). The new Act gave the investigative branch of the police and the CSIS more(prenominal) powers to investigate the very private details of the lives of the suspect terrorists.Also the act put more restrictions on the immigration policies as well as the security measurements in the airports and the borders as well as the seaports during the amending of exist Act like information security Act (Carter). In addition to these new restrictions, the accused somebody has no right to see or to know the evidence which the organization has against him. Even when the Act was revise in 2008, the only person who can see a summary of the evidence is a attorney who was ap denominateed by the government and he cant shoe this evidence to the accused.From the practical point of view, the most minorities in Canada to be touch on by these new measurements are the Muslim minority in particular and the Arabic minority in general. The inclusion of religion as a motive for terrorist activity within the Act may cast a pall over ones faith. The Muslim and Arab communities of Canada have already expressed that many of their members consider that they have fallen victims to racial or cultural discrimination because of the Act. We can say that the bad luck has accompanied the Muslims in this issue.Currently and unfortunately all the terrorists are coming from an Islamic background like Afghanistan, Pakistan or Chechnya. This forced not only our government but also most of the government in the world to link terrorism to Islam as a religion. The government allow not stay silent until a big disaster happens as in the case of September attacks, Lon presume attacks as well as Madrid attacks. If we look at the consume of Rights and Freedoms, we may find some sections that have been violated by the new Terrorism Act. Sections eight to 14 have been extremely infringed after the attacks.Thousands of individuals have been seized in a way that violates the charter. Another shift that happened to our patient society is that the supreme court of Canada has shifted the nature of its rulings regarding the infringement of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. There has been a clear change of mind, within the Court, regarding the authority of international human rights law, at least where highly sensitive security matters are involved, such as deportation of political refugees suspected of being linked with terrorist organisations. (Coutu Giroux)The party that argues that the Muslims and Arabs have been affected negatively by the Anti-terrorism Act might prove their argument by comparing it with the American nationalist Act which was the American anti-terrorism act. In the America n version of the anti-terrorism legislation it condemned any discrimination against Arab Americans, Muslim Americans and Americans from siemens Asia and affirmed that the concept of individual responsibility for wrongdoing is sacrosanct in American society and applies evenly to all religions, racial and ethnic groups( Roach 72) . If we read our Anti-terrorism Act we wont find such a clarification.But from a practical point of view, this clarification didnt immune the Muslims in the USA from profiling but at least it affirmed the principle of equality. On the other hand on that point is another party that advocates that agrees with the anti-terrorism Act and denies that it is targeting the Muslim and Arabic minorities in Canada. On the other hand, we cant blame the government for such actions, whether or not that the religion is the driving force to these kinds of attacks. The government is operative hard to ensure that the Canadian nation live in a secure and stable modality so that we can maintain our economic supremacy.Also it is working hard to ensure that the history will not blame it for neglecting national security issues like terrorism. From this perspective the government had this kind of response to the September cowardly attacks. The other counter party argue that the Arabic and the Islamic communities are not low persecution or any kind of discrimination according to religion or origin. They argue that these new Anti-terrorism Act is apply on every Canadian citizen whether he is Muslim, Christian, Jewish or any religious background.It is applied on every citizen regardless of his ethnic background whether he is polish, Scottish, Arabic or French. In the airports the safeguards dont ask the passengers about their religion or ethnic background if they are travelling from Canada but the passengers who are coming to Canada from suspicious countries, that help the terrorist organizations or have this kind of organizations on their lands such as Pa kistan, Afghanistan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Yemen, the government tends to have more restrictive laws regarding them because they are the most likely individuals to be terrorists.It is all important(p) to mention that the government of Canada put three justifications to the new Act when it was introduced. Firstly, the Anti-terrorism act is in compliance with the charter of rights and freedoms. Secondly, the current reprehensible law is deficient in protecting the national security of Canada from similar attacks to those ones that happened in the US. Finally, the new act enhances the charter values. Ill go over each one of them briefly. Firstly, the government argued that the criminal law was inefficient in keeping the Canadian territories safe from future terrorist attacks.They argued that the police forces dont have the required tools to prevent Canadas throw September 11 so there was an pressing necessity to give the police force and the CSIS these tools to do their job to pro tect our country. Secondly the government argued that the new Act didnt violate the human rights stated in the charter. The minister of justice stated that the act was subject to a very thorough review on Charter ground and that its measures have been knowing so they will respect the values of the charter, and, we expect, survive legal challenges (Roach 75).Thirdly, the government argued that the new Act didnt not only violate the charter rights but it did enhance these rights as well. The government argued that the new Act embodied new provisions regarding detest crime propaganda against any religious minority in Canada. The government officials were aware of the Tsunami of hate propaganda and crimes that will be resulted after the September attacks against Muslims and Arabic minorities thats why the new Act was popular and it has been supported by a lot of people who were worried about the hate crimes.Also the Act allowed the deletion of any content on internet that might refer to be hate propaganda against Islam. In same time the government argued that the Act promoted the value of equality between the individuals because the law is applicable to everyone in the country. Finally it is clear that the Anti-terrorism Act or Bill c-36 has been criticized and debated from every level in the society from the ordinary individuals who are saying that the Act violated the rights and freedoms of Muslim and Arabic minorities in Canada, to our government which is defending the new Act.In my personal opinion, the government is free to pass laws and legislations to protect our national security because if any terrorist attack happened, every on in the country will blame the government from not preventing the great loss in lives and money. But it is important to say the government should try to balance those laws with our own freedoms and regulations as long as our national security is protected. In same time, I see that Muslim and Arabic minorities are not affected bad ly by this law because this law is applied to all Canadians not Muslims only.